A shortlist typically within 72 hours, usually contributing inside two weeks, and 30-day replacement support if the fit is wrong (terms in your agreement).
Shortlist typically in 72 hours · 30-day replacement support · Month-to-month
Teams pick Rust when performance matters and memory bugs are not acceptable: networking services, data processing engines, developer tools, embedded systems and security-sensitive components. The language rewards careful design, but it also has a learning curve that shows up quickly in code review.
A senior Rust developer writes idiomatic code that works with the borrow checker instead of fighting it, uses async Rust sensibly, and knows when unsafe code is justified and how to contain it.
Ownership and lifetimes used cleanly.
Tokio and async design without blocking pitfalls.
Profiling, benchmarks and memory awareness.
Minimal, well-documented unsafe code.
FFI with C and C++, Python bindings or WASM.
Unit, property and integration tests.
Unreadable workarounds. Excessive cloning and reference counting written to satisfy the compiler cost performance and clarity.
Async pitfalls. Blocking calls inside async runtimes cause hard-to-find latency spikes.
Unsafe code without care. Poorly contained unsafe blocks bring back the bugs Rust was meant to prevent.
Every engineer we put forward has at least five years of hands-on experience. Within that, here is how the levels differ.
Senior Developer (5–8 years). Builds services and libraries in Rust with Tokio, Axum or Actix, uses traits and generics well, and writes tests and benchmarks.
Lead / Architect (8+ years). Owns system design, performance profiling, FFI with C or C++, unsafe code review and introducing Rust into existing codebases.
High-performance services. APIs and network services with predictable latency
Rewriting critical components. Replacing C or C++ modules with Rust through FFI, one piece at a time
Data and tooling. Parsers, CLIs, data pipelines and developer tools
WebAssembly. Rust compiled to WASM for browser or edge workloads
Week one. They review the codebase, crates, build times and performance-critical paths.
Weeks two and three. First features or fixes merged with tests and benchmarks.
Week four. A written view on code health, unsafe usage and next steps.
Rewriting everything at once. Rust adoption works best one component at a time.
Hiring for syntax alone. Ownership, lifetimes and async design take real experience.
Ignoring compile times. Workspace structure and dependencies matter for team productivity.
Rates depend on seniority, scope and engagement length. See the cost guide for market ranges, or tell us the role and we will give you a firm number.
Tell us the role and we will typically send a shortlist within 72 hours.
Tell Us the RoleTell us the role. Three to five profiles, typically within 72 hours.